[ipv6-wg] Proposed procedure for ipv6 working group cochair selection process

Shane,

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:09:50AM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote:
> 
> On 2010-01-22 07:23, David Kessens wrote:
> > 
> > As mentioned earlier, I would like to write down our approach for
> > co-chair selection. This would help us to have an open and transparent
> > process to get a cochair appointed, but also help in the future for
> > other working groups as either an example or at the minimum that they
> > can use the same set of principles.
> 
> Regardless of my feelings about this proposal, the IPv6 working group is
> not the right place to discuss issues that affect the entire RIPE community.
> 
> At least, I don't remember seeing "RIPE meta-policy development" on the
> new IPv6 working group charter. ;)

I think it is perfectly fine to write down what we are doing here to
appoint cochairs and to ask whether some people are willing to help me
with that (that is what I did). We are obviously not going to develop
any of this into full policy proposal on the ipv6 working group list
(I already mentioned this a few times as well). I agree with you that
ripe-list at ripe.net might be the best place for doing that.

David Kessens
---