This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Proposed procedure for ipv6 working group cochair selection process
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposed procedure for ipv6 working group cochair selection process
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposed procedure for ipv6 working group cochair selection process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Fri Jan 22 11:39:21 CET 2010
On 22/01/2010 06:23, David Kessens wrote: > As mentioned earlier, I would like to write down our approach for > co-chair selection. This would help us to have an open and transparent > process to get a cochair appointed, but also help in the future for > other working groups as either an example or at the minimum that they > can use the same set of principles. No, it will hinder the process completely and possibly hurt the culture of flexibility and pragmatism that has served us well for so long. Please stop this work item. > Draft Proposal on handling of chair position selection > within the RIPE community Fiercely oppose. > As there is no standardized process for working group selection, this > section serves as an example only and describes on how the IPv6 > working group is currently selecting its co-chairs. Let this be the process explicitly for *this election*, and not for the working group as a whole. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposed procedure for ipv6 working group cochair selection process
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposed procedure for ipv6 working group cochair selection process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]