[ipv6-wg] working group co-chair(s)

Hi,

Thus wrote David Kessens (david.kessens at nsn.com):

> At the same time, I don't believe we should overregulate and loose one
> of the key benefits of our loosely organized community. Therefore, my
> personal preference would be to formulate a set of principles that we
> need to follow to appoint chair people while the actual implementation
> can vary depending on the position that needs to be filled.

Question is, ought it be an appointment (eg by the current chair(s)),
or a vote? and if a vote, who ought to be eligible to be a voter?
People who attend RIPE meetings, or including all 'mere' mailing list
members? Or even wider?
In this case, "who" has a lot of influence on "how" (eg, for the latter
and case something like a Usenet style vote might be ok, for the first
just lift hands at the next meeting). Does anyone feel a need for a
secret vote? they are much harder to do unless you trust the vote taker
absolutely.

regards,
	spz
-- 
spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)