This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

João Damas joao at bondis.org
Mon Feb 15 09:19:47 CET 2010

On 13 Feb 2010, at 13:14, Marco Hogewoning wrote:

>> What do others think of drafting an IPv6 best practices 
>> document in this WG that is specifically for network operators?
> 
> 
> Looking forward to a first draft of this. Is it worth joining up with the routing WG who is, I believe, busy with something on filtering recommendations and deaggregation ?
> 

True, ever since AP-wg agreed that routing considerations, such as (de)aggregation, would be better reflected in a routing document than in an address policy one. Work has been headed by Rob Evans and Sander steffann with help. see http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/routing/r59-minutes.html, the minutes for RIPE 59. Look at the last item in the minutes

Joao

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]