[ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208

On Thursday 04 February 2010 00:44:05 David Kessens wrote:

Hello all,

as a relatively newcomer to this community, I would like to learn more about 
the duties and responsibilities of a WG [co]chair.
As I understand it, the appointment procedures are quite informal with all the 
merits and shortcomings that come with it.

Having said this, I have the impression that 3 people are better than one or 
two. I have met both candidates, read their comments for the WG and I support 
them both. I also think it would be a good idea for other people to come 
forward as well. The migration to IPv6 needs all the effort and support it 
can get, having active and expanding WG / forums such as this.

Regards,

Kostas Zorbadelos 

>
> I already have seen some discussion regarding point 2) and it leads me
> to believe that there is at least some support to appoint both
> candidates as co-chairs.
>
> Before making such a determination though, I would like to see a bit
> more discussion/comments, especially from people who have not taken a
> position yet on this topic.
>
> Basically, knowing our candidates, I would like to hear from you
> whether you prefer to appoint one or two co-chairs, and whether you
> have any preference for either candidate in case you believe one
> co-chair is enough.
>

> ---