This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ralph Smit
ralph.smit at rasm.nl
Sun Feb 7 21:08:09 CET 2010
Marco Hogewoning wrote: > On 3 feb 2010, at 23:44, David Kessens wrote: > >> Basically, knowing our candidates, I would like to hear from you >> whether you prefer to appoint one or two co-chairs, and whether you >> have any preference for either candidate in case you believe one >> co-chair is enough. > > > Hi All, > > I had a short chat with Shane this afternoon and we would like you to > know we as candidated would prefer the option to appoint two co-chairs. > Shane and I have known eachother for quite some time and our goals and > objectives for the future of the IPv6 working group are the same, we > both are looking forward working with David and the community to live up > to the new charter en make IPv6 a succes. > > Thanks for all the support so far, > > MarcoH and Shane > > > I support both candidates and agree with many who replied before me (and the candidates themselves) that 2 co-chairs would be a good idea. Regards, Ralph Smit.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]