This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
Ha: Re: [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitriy V Menzulskiy
DMenzulskiy at beeline.ru
Thu Feb 4 08:20:06 CET 2010
I agree with Fernando. WBR, Dmitry Menzulskiy, AKA DM3740-RIPE García Fernández, Fernando <Fernando.Garcia@ Кому tecnocom.es> "ipv6-wg at ripe.net" От: <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> ipv6-wg-admin at rip Копия e.net Тема Re: [ipv6-wg] Discussion period 04.02.2010 01:56 for co-chair selection until 20100208 After reading their own introduction and knowing both candidates from several RIPE meetings, I give my support to both of them to be co-chairs. I think and odd number is good as break in discussions. El 03/02/2010, a las 23:44, David Kessens escribió: > > All, > > The call for candidates for co-chairs of the IPv6 working group has > resulted in two candidates. See below for their names and a link to the > mailing list with their motivations and plans for the working group: > > Shane Kerr > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00038.html > > Marco Hogewoning > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00041.html > > This brings us to the next step in our process: > > 1) The nominees are given a chance to determine whether they want to > be considered or withdraw as they decided that there are other > good candidates already available > > 2) The community may express opinions that could help the > candidates to come to a decision on whether they want to > be continued to be considered as a candidate > - the community may consider appointing more than one co-chair > in case of several good candidates > > Let's take until the end of Mon Feb 8, 2010 in a timezone of your > choice to determine an outcome for both 1) and 2). > > I already have seen some discussion regarding point 2) and it leads me > to believe that there is at least some support to appoint both > candidates as co-chairs. > > Before making such a determination though, I would like to see a bit > more discussion/comments, especially from people who have not taken a > position yet on this topic. > > Basically, knowing our candidates, I would like to hear from you > whether you prefer to appoint one or two co-chairs, and whether you > have any preference for either candidate in case you believe one > co-chair is enough. > > Note that this period is for open discussion and that it is perfectly > fine to do alternate proposals. > > Our objective is to see if we can come to a consensus which allows us > to avoid more complex ways of making a selection such as a vote. > > After our discussion period is over, I will determine if there is > enough basis to do a Last Call to confirm a selection decision as > determined from our discussion phase, or whether we perhaps need a bit > more time for discussion or that we will have to resort to organizing > a vote. > > I hope this helps, > > David Kessens > --- > -- Tecnocom Fernando García Fernández D.G. Integración de Redes y Sistemas Josefa Valcarcel, 26 Edificio Merrimack III Madrid - 28027 Tel. Fijo: 901900900 ext 40383 Fax: (+34) 914313240 Tel. Móvil: (+34) 649428591 E-mail: fernando.garcia at tecnocom.es http://www.tecnocom.es -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20100204/e9547909/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: graycol.gif Type: image/gif Size: 105 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20100204/e9547909/attachment.gif> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pic08182.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1255 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20100204/e9547909/attachment-0001.gif> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ecblank.gif Type: image/gif Size: 45 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20100204/e9547909/attachment-0002.gif>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]