This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Wed Feb 3 12:07:22 CET 2010
Martin, On 2010-02-03 10:58, Martin Millnert wrote: > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 10:01 +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >> If people think there is an interest in having a NAT-broken network >> around, then please make it available on a dedicated SSID, but don't >> experiment with the meeting network. > Short version: > > I second this statement. This makes sense. Although of course I would like this to be something like: RIPE 61: ESSID RIPE is globally-unique IPv4+IPv6, ESSID RIPE-NAT is NAT IPv4 plus globally-unique IPv6 RIPE 63: ESSID RIPE is NAT IPv4 plus globally-unique IPv6 ESSID RIPE-NO-NAT is globally unique IPv4+IPv6 In the future we could further mimic the "real world" by charging money for the use of the RIPE-NO-NAT network. For a sufficently massive fee we could probably even keep addresses persistent between meetings. ;) -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]