This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Tue Feb 2 17:39:53 CET 2010

Shane Kerr wrote:
> But the idea that no production networks can use RFC 1918 is a bit
> disturbing, because in 2 years or so there won't be any IPv4 addresses
> left, and people will be forced to use RFC 1918 addresses. Does that
> mean there won't be any IPv4 production networks in 2013?

Shane,

Please, don't push the CGN(or LSN) idea any further. NAT-ing the whole ISP 
networks would permanently kill end2end paradigm.

I don't want to see my whole city or even country to operate in RFC1918 address 
space behind one big NAT in near future.

Sorry, I agree with Gert. :)

/jan

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]