[ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)

On 14.12.2010 2:14, Thomas Narten wrote:
>> A) A lot of people (including RFC 3177) claim every residential user
>>   should get a /48. A few recent opinions are collected here:
>
> RFC 3177 is old, and will hopefully soon be replaced. The current
> update to it is:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites-00
>
> That document recently completed IETF LC (with no significant
> opposition) and is being processed by the IESG.

...beside Randy's efforts to take the addressing politics out of IETF for good.

I must admit I agree with IETF staying engineering entity.

IETF has nothing to do with end user address assignments, but on the other hand, 
RiRs seems to try avoiding that discussion, so we need another place to settle that.

IMHO RiR community would be best place to define that, but that's just my .2 
cents worth.

Best, Jan Zorz
go6.si