This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
S.P.Zeidler
spz at serpens.de
Fri Sep 25 13:44:51 CEST 2009
Hi, Thus wrote Kostas Zorbadelos (kzorba at otenet.gr): > > its terms of reference. For instance, how does the RIPE IPv6 WG > > differ from ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de ? > > I read that "IPv6 discussion should naturally move to wider forums". > Can anyone mention any such forums active right now? Is > ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de such a forum? Not speaking authoritatively, but since noone else seems to want to pick it up: ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de is for operational issues in IPv6, like eg "Why is the shortest path to my next door neighbour suddenly crossing the pacific, twice?" or "Can you see my prefix?" or "Announcement of prefix XX is doing funny things", as well as "Could a IPv6-clueful person from AS YY please contact me offlist?". It is not limited to the RIPE region but intended as a nanog equiv for IPv6 networks. Of course, topic shift happens. :) regards, spz -- spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]