This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Sep 24 17:02:35 CEST 2009
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:44:38PM +0200, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
> Even if open ports wouldn't be an issue, think of:
>
> - inbound connections (people using VOIP)
> - VPN to connect back home (meeting is still providing fixed IP for
> that purpose)
> - CPU load
> - traceability (Pentagon got hacked by somebody at RIPE-XX)
Which is the point, isn't it? "NAT BAD! IPv6 GOOD!".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 141055
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]