This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Re: LDP over Ipv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: LDP over Ipv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: LDP over Ipv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Tue Sep 8 03:08:11 CEST 2009
On Monday 07 September 2009 11:36:13 pm Isacco Fontana wrote: > Do you think we can start discussion with big vendors > (Cisco/Juniper) ? Gert is right, the more we "collectively" speak to our vendors, the quicker they will likely implement the technology (it's not new, it's already been documented). For instance, I've been pushing Cisco and Juniper for an MPLS control plane for v6 for nearly 2 years now, but this isn't enough. Vendors tend to listen if: a) there is a collective. or b) as Gert and myself have already mentioned, you're waving wads of cash their way. Cheers, Mark. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20090908/e8780526/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: LDP over Ipv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: LDP over Ipv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]