This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] LDP over Ipv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] LDP over Ipv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Mon Sep 7 06:39:02 CEST 2009
On Sunday 06 September 2009 03:45:34 pm Isacco Fontana wrote: > we're planning to use ipv6 only on our backbone. Our idea > is to use ipv6 for backbone mpls and mpls vpn to holding > old ipv4 customers and all ipv4 networks inside vpn BUT > today LDP work only with IPv4. So now we can't use ipv6 > for mpls and we have still use ipv4 addresses to run ldp > on backbone and 6vpe for vpn. I may need to pull up some old e-mails to confirm, but the last time we spoke to Juniper, they planned to have support for an MPLS control plane for IPv6 some time end of this year (nothing yet, so far). As for Cisco, no firm commitment. Let me give them another ping and see if I turn up anything useful. Cheers, Mark. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20090907/541904f5/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] LDP over Ipv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]