[ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal

Gert,

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:25:09PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:47:29AM -0700, David Kessens wrote:
> > You clearly have not read the minutes and/or have been at any of the  
> > meetings as we have run out of time every single meeting in the past
> > few years and we needed the largest meeting room available.
> 
> Which might not be *so* contradictory in the end.
> 
> If we consider IPv6 to be "the mainstream Internet" in the future, the
> IPv6 content will sort of naturally move to "the plenary" (because that's
> what we all should be interested in, no?).  If that happens, the question
> "what remains to be specifically discussed inside the IPv6 WG" is a 
> valid one.

Yes, that should be the natural course when IPv6 is going to become
more mainstream. Even now already, we carefully weigh (with
plenary/eof program committee) whether certain topics are more fit for
the plenary program or for the IPv6 working group.

David Kessens
---