[ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal

> Since this group isn't actually doing anything, I propose we:
> 
>      1. Shut down this working group after the next RIPE meeting.
>      2. Move discussion of IPv6 issues to other working groups (since
>         "IPv6 issues" will become "IP issues" very soon anyway).

Given that we are just now moving into the time period when people will
be seriously deploying IPv6, I strongly oppose this move.

Instead, RIPE should promote this WG, and it would not hurt to clarify
its terms of reference. For instance, how does the RIPE IPv6 WG 
differ from ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de ?

It costs nothing to carry a mailing list with very low traffic, and even
if it only serves as an announcement list for the next three years, that
is atill a worthwhile use of the RIPE resources.

--Michael Dillon