This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Kessens
david.kessens at nsn.com
Fri Sep 4 17:47:29 CEST 2009
Shane, On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:04:10PM +0200, Shane Kerr wrote: > > Since the last RIPE meeting there have been messages from the RIPE NCC > about their IPv6ActNow stuff and a survey, and some messages about the > minutes. The only thread with any content has been one about IPv6 > minimum allocation sizes (thanks Marco!). > > This is not much. > > Since this group isn't actually doing anything, I propose we: > > 1. Shut down this working group after the next RIPE meeting. > 2. Move discussion of IPv6 issues to other working groups (since > "IPv6 issues" will become "IP issues" very soon anyway). You clearly have not read the minutes and/or have been at any of the meetings as we have run out of time every single meeting in the past few years and we needed the largest meeting room available. In any case, are you coming to the next RIPE meeting so that I can put this on the agenda and you can propose this to the working group ? David Kessens ---
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]