[ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter

> And now with my working group chair hat on ;-):
>
> It is helpful if you post such comments (negative as well as positive)
> on the list so that people have a chance to show agreement or
> disagreement, or suggestions for improvement. Eg. it is much easier
> for Shane to know whether a particular direction makes sense if he
> knows that there is support from more than one person.

David hi.

Normally I would agree with you, I also think public discussion is important.

In this case we saw massive support for Shane's first charter and also support 
for few suggestions for modifications. Shane just needs to tweak a bit his text 
and we might get the charter with full consensus in a very short period of time.

I think no more data collecting is needed on this and that's why I agreed on 
helping Shane with tweaking the text.

With respect, Jan Zorz