This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Re: Proposal for new charter
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Proposal for new charter
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Proposal for new charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Tue Oct 20 17:36:11 CEST 2009
On 20 okt 2009, at 17:01, S.P.Zeidler wrote: > Thus wrote Geert Jan de Groot (GeertJan.deGroot at xs4all.nl): > >>> The working group activities may be anything useful in helping >>> people >>> deploy IPv6. These activities include: >>> * Outreach >>> * Co-operation >>> * Education >> >> I also would like to propose to add "handle early deployment >> experiences" >> or wording to that effect - as I reported yesterday, the PMTU-thing >> reported on the list during the RIPE meeting. > > I think it would be unwise to limit to early deployment experiences. > "So we had the network running happily for 3 years and then we > needed to > expand it and ran into the following, oops" is quite valuable too > (and IPv6 won't be the new thing forever either :) > > Of course the 1001st "we deployed and it ping6es, wheee!" is fun > for the people involved but not necessarily a topic for a mailing list > like this. So, "reports on novel problems and experiences", maybe? > Native speakers to the fore :) Keep in mind a charter should be somewhat short and not to specific, it's not the agenda... Groet, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Proposal for new charter
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Proposal for new charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]