[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:23:19AM +0100, Remco van Mook wrote:
> If a single 6rd instance is accepted as a rule the end result of
> that will be that every ISP in the world with non-contiguous
> allocations will be asking for a /24 next, knowing full well that
> they're only going to use 0,1% of the network side of that space,
> ever.

Just to drop a bit of bait into this lively discussion :-9 - we could
actually afford to give every organization that reasonably claims to
serve IP connectivity to more than 1000 customers a /24.  There's 10 
million /24s inside FP 001.  All in all, the RIRs have about 20.000 
members today - 1/500th of that.

Of course that's not my call to make, but would require a formal policy 
change (and isn't actually the point of this discussion - which is
"provide guidance to the IPRAs on whether the WG is considering this to
be acceptable use").

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  144438

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279