This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Announcement: RIPE NCC Training Courses
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Boogman boogman at ip-plus.net
Wed Nov 25 16:44:23 CET 2009

Hi,

we are planning to offer IPv6 connectivity to our xDSL and FTTH customer base via IPv6-6RD. 
(see  <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-townsley-ipv6-6rd-01> or for a working implementation Free's presentation at RIPE-58: <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-58/content/presentations/ipv6-free.pdf>).

We asked RIPE NCC for a larger than /32 allocation (because of the way how 6RD encapsulates the customers IPv4 address in his IPv6 address and also because we want to give the customer a small subnet).

The IPRA now isn't sure how to proceed and after consultation with the Policy Development Manager asked me to pose the question to the community at large.

What do you think, should RIPE NCC allocate larger than /32 blocks to LIRs for cases like this and not only based on the number of end-customers?

Cheers
Jan
Swisscom IP-Plus - AS3303

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Announcement: RIPE NCC Training Courses
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]