[ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 3

Shane Kerr wrote:
> All,
> 
> I have tried to incorporate additional comments in this version of the
> charter. I don't plan on producing any more versions - we can debate
> each word forever, but I think we have reached the point of diminishing
> returns.
> 
> If we have consensus, then we can consider ourselves rechartered!
> Otherwise someone else can work thorough the text again (or start over
> from scratch).
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> IPv6 is the next generation IP protocol. The IPv6 working group exists
> to promote IPv6 adoption.
> 
> The working group activities may be anything useful in helping people
> to deploy IPv6, and to manage IPv4/IPv6 co-existence. These activities
> include:
> 
> * Outreach
> * Education
> * Sharing deployment experiences
> * Discussing and fixing operational issues
> 
> The working group will cooperate with operators and others, both 
> inside and outside the networking industry, to share resources and
> combine efforts.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Differences:
> 
> -IPv6 is the next-generation IP protocol. The IPv6 working group exists
> +IPv6 is the next generation IP protocol. The IPv6 working group exists
> 
> De-hyphenating. Or dehyphenating, if you prefer. ;)
>  
> 
> -* Discussing operational issues
> +* Discussing and fixing operational issues
> 
> I don't see any harm in mentioning that we'll try to fix operational
> issues in addition to discussing them. 
> 
> 
> -The working group will co-operate within the networking industry and
> -without, to share resources and combine efforts.
> +The working group will cooperate with operators and others, both
> +inside and outside the networking industry, to share resources and
> +combine efforts.
> 
> More hyphen fixups. Clarifying that the "networking industry" does not
> just mean operators. Remove the clumsy "within/without" text that
> apparently only made sense to me.
> 
> --
> Shane
> 
> 

I believe this is a keeper :)