This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Thu Oct 25 12:07:40 CEST 2007
> 1) Network operators and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) > are called to the urgent deployment of IPv6 across their > networks as soon as possible. This deployment must include > providing IPv6 access to End Users and ensuring services are > accessible by IPv6. I would like to see this text explicitly mention both "deployment of IPv6 network access" and "deployment of IPv6 transitional measures". Otherwise, decisionmakers will think that it is sufficient to offer an IPv6 version of their IPv4 access product. That is not too hard to do, but it doesn't deliver what most customers want, which is access to the whole Internet, IPv4 and IPv6. That is where deployment of transitional measures become important, and I would argue, that they are more important right now than deploying IPv6 access services because the transitional measures solve problems that are happening right now with native IPv6 in OS/X and Vista. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]