[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

At 10:49 18/10/2007, Sascha Lenz wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Patrick Vande Walle schrieb:
>>Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>* Gert Doering:
>>>
>>>>2) We urge network operators and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to deploy IPv6 across their networks as soon as possible. This deployment must include providing IPv6 access to End Users and ensuring services are accessible by IPv6.
>>>>
>>>Shouldn't this paragraph target RIPE members specifically? Or, put
>>>differently, why are end users and software vendors excluded?
>>>
>>Speaking as an end user, which probably does not qualify me as being
>>part of the "RIPE Community":
>>Agree with Florian's comments, and I would add hardware vendors to the
>>list. As long as there are no commodity CPEs supporting IPv6, there is
>>no incentive for ISPs to deploy IPv6 to their end users, especially
>>those targetting the home users.
>
>even though the statement cannot be more than political "blah-blah" without any real outcome :-), i want to join in that the wording SHOULD include at least vendors end end-suer, since they are the biggest problem (point of view: a Consultant).
>Probably "network operators" is meant to include end-users, but that's not clear enough.
>And i also see vendors as part of "the community" here, but probably they don't think they are addressed without explicitely mentioning it :-)
>
>ISPs won't start deploying IPv6 more widely without end-users requiring it and vendors have a full (as in COMPLETE, WORKING) set of IPv6 capable devices, including SOHO CPEs.

End users won't require it; they know little about v4 and v6 and only care about their applications working and being able to reach the hosts/sites they want to reach. When some parts of the Internet are only reachable via v6 *that* is when users will 
want to know why and will kick their ISPs, who will hasten to get their act together and will then kick their upstreams.

We have a fully v6-compliant network already - and little traffic.

>...heck, i already have one upstream explicitely SHUTTING DOWN its IPv6 (testbed) service (Allocation returned) without any production replacement since noone wants to have IPv6 connectivity...yes, big german business/resale ISP ... scary.


-- Tim