This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Thu Oct 18 15:39:16 CEST 2007

* Tim Streater:

> End users won't require it; they know little about v4 and v6 and only
> care about their applications working and being able to reach the
> hosts/sites they want to reach.

Does this reflect your experience with the academic community?  (Just
curious.)

> When some parts of the Internet are only reachable via v6 *that* is
> when users will want to know why and will kick their ISPs, who will
> hasten to get their act together and will then kick their upstreams.

Uh-oh, this reminds me of the Internet2 Detective. 8-/

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]