[ipv6-wg] IPv6 Deployment Panel at ICANN, Lisbon

Hi Carlos,

On Mar 26, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Carlos Friacas wrote:
>
> Going back to the subject on this message:
> I think the session was generally positive. Next time perhaps the  
> term "Tutorial" should be dropped... this and the fact it was held  
> from 13:00 to 15:00 on a sunday might have driven people away from  
> it......
>
> I specially did get a bad feeling about the question being raised  
> by the jordan government person: didn't feel he got a proper and  
> clear answer... imho he should have heard IPv6 should be something  
> to have in mind because v4 address exaustion can in fact endanger  
> internet companies' business in jordan (in the same way it will in  
> every other country!) in the medium/long run.
>
> In fact, it's the second time i get the same feeling... once in an  
> ITU IPv6 session someone did a simmilar question and nobody  
> supplied a proper answer too... :-(
>
> I'm blaming myself for not having stepped up to the mike on that  
> moment (despite a small crisis on the event's network i was trying  
> to debug...), but i really hope next time someone speaks out loud  
> why *everybody* should take v6 seriously. :-)

Thanks for your feedback on the session. I know the timing and  
billing were not perfect. I'm sorry about that.

If you add your comments and answer on the session web page (http:// 
public.icann.org/25mar/tutorial-ipv6), or write a blog on the public  
participation site it's likely that Mr Fraihat will see your answer  
there.

Thanks,

-- 
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison