This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Jan 2 14:52:58 CET 2007
On 2-jan-2007, at 14:08, Ray Plzak wrote: > I would think that an interesting statistic to look at would be the > consumption rates by region and by the top 10 economy/country > consumers in > both IPv4 and IPv6. I would also look at the percentage of the > allocated > IPv6 resources by region and by the top 10 economy/country consumers. IPv4: +---------+---------+------+ | rir | country | ipv4 | +---------+---------+------+ | afrinic | ZA | 9.61 | | afrinic | EG | 1.38 | | afrinic | TN | 0.63 | | afrinic | MA | 0.59 | | afrinic | DZ | 0.27 | | afrinic | NG | 0.20 | | afrinic | KE | 0.16 | | afrinic | MZ | 0.10 | | afrinic | GH | 0.10 | | afrinic | MU | 0.09 | +---------+---------+------+ +-------+---------+--------+ | rir | country | ipv4 | +-------+---------+--------+ | apnic | JP | 117.66 | | apnic | CN | 98.02 | | apnic | KR | 51.11 | | apnic | AU | 30.63 | | apnic | TW | 18.16 | | apnic | IN | 8.28 | | apnic | HK | 6.67 | | apnic | NZ | 4.94 | | apnic | TH | 3.32 | | apnic | SG | 3.10 | +-------+---------+--------+ +------+---------+---------+ | rir | country | ipv4 | +------+---------+---------+ | arin | US | 1366.43 | | arin | CA | 71.32 | | arin | JP | 33.61 | | arin | GB | 33.56 | | arin | DE | 16.92 | | arin | FR | 16.78 | | arin | PR | 0.47 | | arin | VI | 0.08 | | arin | JM | 0.07 | | arin | BB | 0.07 | +------+---------+---------+ +--------+---------+-------+ | rir | country | ipv4 | +--------+---------+-------+ | lacnic | BR | 19.27 | | lacnic | MX | 16.26 | | lacnic | AR | 3.89 | | lacnic | CL | 3.60 | | lacnic | VE | 2.41 | | lacnic | CO | 1.81 | | lacnic | CR | 1.27 | | lacnic | PE | 0.97 | | lacnic | PA | 0.82 | | lacnic | UY | 0.37 | +--------+---------+-------+ +---------+---------+--------+ | rir | country | ipv4 | +---------+---------+--------+ | ripencc | EU | 115.83 | | ripencc | GB | 60.35 | | ripencc | DE | 44.68 | | ripencc | FR | 41.45 | | ripencc | IT | 19.14 | | ripencc | ES | 18.69 | | ripencc | NL | 18.07 | | ripencc | SE | 15.25 | | ripencc | RU | 13.97 | | ripencc | PL | 10.32 | +---------+---------+--------+ (Note that the European class A's are under ARIN, not RIPE.) For IPv6, I'm counting the number of /32s (so a /20 is worth 4096 /32s): +---------+---------+--------+------+ | rir | country | allocs | ipv6 | +---------+---------+--------+------+ | ripencc | DE | 95 | 9820 | | ripencc | FR | 35 | 8226 | | ripencc | EU | 7 | 6149 | | ripencc | IT | 30 | 4125 | | ripencc | PL | 22 | 2069 | | ripencc | NL | 46 | 557 | | ripencc | NO | 12 | 268 | | ripencc | GB | 64 | 96 | | ripencc | CH | 28 | 59 | | ripencc | AT | 23 | 24 | +---------+---------+--------+------+ Top 20 for the rest of the world: +---------+---------+--------+------+ | rir | country | allocs | ipv6 | +---------+---------+--------+------+ | apnic | JP | 54 | 7237 | | apnic | KR | 24 | 5172 | | apnic | AU | 10 | 4105 | | apnic | TW | 23 | 2242 | | arin | US | 193 | 207 | | lacnic | AR | 8 | 30 | | apnic | CN | 18 | 25 | | arin | CA | 23 | 23 | | apnic | AP | 1 | 16 | | apnic | IN | 11 | 14 | | arin | MX | 13 | 13 | | apnic | NZ | 10 | 13 | | apnic | ID | 12 | 12 | | apnic | MY | 10 | 10 | | apnic | TH | 8 | 8 | | afrinic | ZA | 8 | 8 | | lacnic | BR | 7 | 7 | | apnic | HK | 7 | 7 | | apnic | PH | 7 | 7 | | lacnic | VE | 6 | 6 | +---------+---------+--------+------+ I think I detect a difference in policy between ARIN and APNIC... Per RIR: +---------+--------+-------+ | rir | allocs | ipv6 | +---------+--------+-------+ | afrinic | 24 | 24 | | apnic | 210 | 18883 | | arin | 223 | 237 | | lacnic | 66 | 88 | | ripencc | 545 | 31577 | +---------+--------+-------+ IPv6 allocations in 2006: +---------+---------+--------+------+ | ripencc | IT | 2 | 4097 | | apnic | TW | 6 | 2131 | | ripencc | PL | 3 | 2050 | | apnic | KR | 2 | 1040 | | ripencc | DE | 12 | 523 | | arin | US | 38 | 52 | | apnic | AP | 1 | 16 | | ripencc | GB | 13 | 14 | | apnic | CN | 2 | 9 | | ripencc | FR | 8 | 8 | | ripencc | IE | 7 | 7 | | apnic | ID | 6 | 6 | | afrinic | ZA | 5 | 5 | | apnic | NZ | 5 | 5 | | ripencc | CH | 5 | 5 | | ripencc | ES | 5 | 5 | | arin | CA | 4 | 4 | | ripencc | AT | 3 | 3 | | ripencc | EE | 3 | 3 | | lacnic | BR | 3 | 3 | +---------+---------+--------+------+ Yearly totals: +------+--------+-------+ | year | allocs | ipv6 | +------+--------+-------+ | 1999 | 2 | 2 | | 2000 | 8 | 8 | | 2001 | 11 | 11 | | 2002 | 119 | 119 | | 2003 | 226 | 260 | | 2004 | 252 | 13349 | | 2005 | 242 | 26998 | | 2006 | 208 | 10062 | +------+--------+-------+ Total IPv6 allocations (of at least a /32): +--------+-------+ | allocs | ipv6 | +--------+-------+ | 1068 | 50809 | +--------+-------+ That's out of about 536 million /32s total in 2000::/3 so we're now at about 0.0094% utilization of the global IPv6 unicast space (65% for IPv4). Note also that 2006 was much lower than 2005 and even lower than 2004 in amount of IPv6 space allocated and even lower than 2003 in the number of blocks allocated.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]