This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] RIPE NCC Makes Record Number of IPv6 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE NCC Makes Record Number of IPv6 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE NCC Makes Record Number of IPv6 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friacas
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Fri Dec 14 11:22:50 CET 2007
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: > >> Working with publich *shame* is a bad idea - OTOH, putting up >> a Top10 list of prefixes that have been stable for months, >> and that actually have services inside, would be nice for >> those ISPs... if it could be done in a reasonable way, which it can't. > > Yes, public shame is a bad idea that will backfire anyway. > > However, in 2009 and 2010, companies that have not deployed > enough IPv6 will be in crisis because they will begin to > lose new orders due to a lack of IPv4 addresses to connect > those new customers. This will trigger a wave of takeovers > as companies who are further ahead in IPv6 deployment > are able to buy the weaker ones at bargain prices. > > In order to evaluate the strength/weakness of a company's > IPv6 deployment, it seems to me that a better measure is > the amount of traffic going through IPv6 public peering > points AMS-IX reported some bad news in that field recently :-( see RIPE-55. > and the amount of IPv6 encapsulated in IPv4 that > travels though IPv4 peering points. Someone also mentioned some work on that aspect @ RIPE-55. Would like to see (live) data about that. > Stability is not a very > good measure and the existence of an IPv6 announcement doesn't > tell you anything about whether or not the company is using > the IPv6 connectivity. > > --Michael Dillon Plan B? Start digging DNS to find AAAAs, and other RRs associated with AAAAs? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Carlos Friac,as See: Wide Area Network Working Group (WAN) www.gigapix.pt FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional www.ipv6.eu Av. do Brasil, n.101 www.6diss.org 1700-066 Lisboa, Portugal, Europe www.geant2.net Tel: +351 218440100 Fax: +351 218472167 www.fccn.pt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- The end is near........ see http://ipv4.potaroo.net "Internet is just routes (241744/992), naming (billions) and... people!" Esta mensagem foi enviada de 2001:690:2080:8004:250:daff:fe3b:2830 Aviso de Confidencialidade Esta mensagem e' exclusivamente destinada ao seu destinatario, podendo conter informacao CONFIDENCIAL, cuja divulgacao esta' expressamente vedada nos termos da lei. Caso tenha recepcionado indevidamente esta mensagem, solicitamos-lhe que nos comunique esse mesmo facto por esta via ou para o telefone +351 218440100 devendo apagar o seu conteudo de imediato. Warning This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. It may contain CONFIDENTIAL information protected by law. If this message has been received by error, please notify us via e-mail or by telephone +351 218440100 and delete it immediately.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE NCC Makes Record Number of IPv6 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE NCC Makes Record Number of IPv6 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]