[ipv6-wg] Draft Agenda (v1) for ipv6 wg RIPE51

====BT: Hi David,

	I'd appreciate to have a 10-15 mn slot to present 6DISS a new european 
project started last April 1st.

   Thanx & cheers,

   +Bernard T.
---

David Kessens wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Please see below for the draft agenda (v1) of the ipv6 working group.
> 
> This is the first version of the agenda so we are still looking for
> agenda topics and contributions for the various standard sections of
> the agenda. Please let me know if there is anything that you would
> like to discuss.
> 
> I would also like to draw your attention to the plenary part of the meeting
> that has various interesting ipv6 presentations on the agenda (see below).
> 
> David Kessens
> ---
> 
> Draft Agenda (v1) for the IPv6 Working Group Meeting RIPE51
> 
> When:   Wednesday, October 12, 2005, 17:00-18:00
> Where:  Grand Ballroom, Hotel Krasnapolsky, Amsterdam
> 
> A. Administrative stuff
>    - appointment of scribe
>    - agenda bashing
>    (David Kessens)
> 
> B. Quick update from the RIPE NCC regarding ipv6 services
>    (RIPE NCC)
> 
> C. Discussion on:
>    Global IPv6 routing table status
>    (Gert Doering)
> 
> D. Report(s) about *actual* v6 traffic volume as compared to v4?
>    *what's real* out there, not what's on powerpoint?
>    (input from the audience)
> 
> E. Developments/initiatives regarding IPv6 in the RIPE region and beyond
>    (input from the audience)
> 
> F. Input for the RIPE NCC Activity Plan
>    (input from the audience)
> 
> Z. AOB
> ---
> 
> Interesting topics in the plenary section:
> 
> TUESDAY
> 09:00 - 10:30
> 
> 6. IPv6 Routing Update.
>    Gert Doering. Spacenet (20 min)
> 
>    Update on observations on the state of the IPv6 default free
>    routing table.
> 
> 7. IPv6 Multihoming Status.
>    Kurtis Lindqvist. Netnod (30 min)
> 
>    An up-to-date status report on the progress towards scalable IPv6
>    multihoming.
> 
> 8. IPv6 Address Allocation
>    --An Alternative Algorithm for the Sparse Allocation Process.
>    Mae Wang (30 min)
> 
>    IP address allocation policies significantly impact the Internet
>    infrastructure, affecting many parties such as router
>    manufacturers, ISPs, and end users. An address allocation policy
>    can also directly affect the performance of the Internet.
> 
>    For example, address fragmentation, a key problem in IPv4, degrades
>    address lookup performance in routers. Thus, a well-designed
>    address allocation policy needs to minimise fragmentation while
>    using the address space efficiently.
> 
>    This paper attempts to quantify the performance of address
>    allocation policies by modelling key features that lead to
>    fragmentation and inefficient address space usage.
> 
>    Our main contributions are: (i) we identify a drawback of the
>    current IPv6 address allocation policy, which treats all entities
>    uniformly, (ii) we propose a scheme that takes future growth rate
>    into account for allocations, and (iii) an analytical model for
>    measuring the efficiency of allocation schemes, allowing us to
>    quantify the improvement our proposal offers over the current
>    scheme. We believe that a quantitative study of allocation policies
>    is timely since IPv6 address allocation is just beginning in
>    earnest.
> 
> ------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4025 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20050930/a7f667f1/attachment.bin>