This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Tue Nov 29 17:17:54 CET 2005

>> Lots of efforts (Multi6, SHIM6, etc.) are being made to solve these real 
>> issues for a good reason.
> Regardless of the efforts, from a provider POV it's only "work in
> progress".

one of the key points from the nanog session was that shim6 is the
*wrong* work in progress.  what is needed is _site_ multi-homing,
not host multi-homing.

randy

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]