This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Mon Nov 28 20:01:57 CET 2005

HI,

On 11/28/05, Jørgen Hovland <jorgen at hovland.cx>
> Hi,
> Perfect match is faster but far from better. What I think perhaps would be
> interesting to see in the future with regards to IPv6 and PI is the
> following:
>
> 1. No PI. _Only_ network operators get a prefix.
> 2. Customers of network operators can at any time change provider and take
> their assigned prefix with them.

#2 sounds like PI to me. What have I missed?

--
Cheers,

McTim
$ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]