This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Fri Nov 25 12:10:39 CET 2005

* Roger Jorgensen:

> The absolute max global routing table would by this be 40bits, of 
> course the real one are alot smaller. That one is closer to 32bits, and 
> that is STILL A huge number, probably more close to 20bits of entries.

Only 20 bits?  IPv4 already has more than 17 bits of entries.  I still
don't see the problem.  To the contrary, your numbers suggest that
IPv6 is very similar to IPv4 in this regard.

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]