This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Thu Nov 24 18:58:04 CET 2005

* Roger Jorgensen:

> Can't we all just drop using the word multihoming and IPv6 PI? 
> They all reflect back to how thing was done with IPv4 and those ways are 
> doomed to fail with IPv6 simply due to the size of the IP space.

I'm a relative newcomer to this area.  Could you give a pointer to
some explanation *why* the IPv6 address space size causes this
problem?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]