This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Mon Nov 21 20:05:02 CET 2005

>> Can't we all just drop using the word multihoming and IPv6 PI?
>> They all reflect back to how thing was done with IPv4 and those ways are
>> doomed to fail with IPv6 simply due to the size of the IP space.
> Well said.

indeed.  since, by this argument, we can now assume v6 sites will not
multi-home, there is no need for PI space at all.

randy

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]