This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or so mething else?
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Carsten Schiefner ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Fri Nov 18 16:28:17 CET 2005

Michael,

Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:
> [...]
> If they don't move quickly, then someone else will build that
> anycast infrastructure and both DENIC and AFNIC will be reduced
> to being customers instead of network operators.

why would that be?

Best regards,

	Carsten

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or so mething else?
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]