This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or so mething else?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or so mething else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or so mething else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Nov 17 15:18:08 CET 2005
> Unlike others, I do see dns being _critical_ to the infrastructure. i think most folk think of dns as critical infrastructure > No other protocol is that much subject of political discussions. and this says what about the dns, other than the need to taks a shower often? > As an operator being dependent on TLD operations I want to see > a stable operations of the dns tree. as am i. as do i. > Consequently I support giving the TLD operators the tools they > need to make it a stable service. yes. and how do you go from here to special address allocations? do we also need special computers? special electricity? special racks? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or so mething else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or so mething else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]