This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [db-wg] Re: Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE 50 Report
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [db-wg] Re: Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE 50 Report
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE 50 Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Wed May 25 03:48:46 CEST 2005
Hi David, On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:31:40PM -0700, David Kessens wrote: > > What are you talking about here? What "new, operational IPv6 mailing > > list" are you referring to? What has the RIPE IPv6 Working Group to do > > with it? > > Again, the working group didn't decide this. It was brought up that a > new mailing list was formed and we received several comments on this > topic. Among others that it might not be ideal to have such a list > being run by an enthiustic individual as it is important to keep > mailarchives preserved even if the individual moves on to pursue other > interests. However, this was a comment from the audience, not a > decision by the working group. Yep, this is exactly my understanding what happenend, too (I watched the "web"cast but had no chance to react as the stream had too much delay). I'm still surprised about such a concern, given that ipv6-ops is not at all "mission critical", and other much more "mission critical" lists like nsp-sec are (at least while I was subscribed) also run by "enthusiastic individuals". If anyone wants to mirror the archives I have no problem with that at all. Actually, someone already set up archival at GMANE on 2005-04-18: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.org.operators.ipv6 so the public off-site archive is already there. > In relation to this topic, I just noticed that the working group > website page now mentions: > > > There is also a global mailing list (not regional RIR/NOG) dedicated > > to operational matters of the global IPv6 (production, not 6BONE) > > Internet at: > > > > http://lists.cluenet.de/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-ops/ > > > > If you are taking part in IPv6 BGP or are interested in global IPv6 > > operational matters, please join the list. The purpose is to foster > > exchange of experience and resolve problems which require non-local > > coordination. The list is also available to discuss problems people > > face while deploying IPv6. > > I did not request the RIPE NCC to put this information on the website > neither did the working endorse this mailing list in any form or way. Me neither. RIPE NCC did notify me a few weeks ago that they did add a reference. It wasn't done on my request. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [db-wg] Re: Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE 50 Report
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE 50 Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]