This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: What is a site?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [ipv6-wg at localhost] Re: What is a site?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Francis Dupont
Francis.Dupont at enst-bretagne.fr
Mon May 9 13:38:09 CEST 2005
In your previous mail you wrote: Let me try to make most of my point somewhat more concisely: In programming, there are only three values: zero, one and many. What we need to do is come up with a good prefix size for networks that: - have no router => /64 for the connection link itself. - have one router => it depends on the number of links behind but it seems that /60 is right. - have multiple routers => if the topology is complex (HD ratio ~ 0.5) and the number of links ~ 10 then a /56 is right. IMHO the best is to authorize a /56 in all cases (i.e., move from /48 to /56 for common home networks) and leave DHCPv6 PD negociates the right value, "up to" /56. Regards Francis.Dupont at enst-bretagne.fr
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: What is a site?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [ipv6-wg at localhost] Re: What is a site?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]