This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon May 9 13:05:37 CEST 2005
Hi, On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:53:52PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 9-mei-2005, at 12:40, Gert Doering wrote: > > >As for the /128s: I think that providing a /64 for a dialup router, > >negotiating unique host-IDs with incoming PPP clients and then sending > >RAs for the "shared" /64 down the PPP links will work fine for /128 > >(auto-)assignment. I'm not sure, though, whether that's fully backed > >by all relevant specs. > > I don't understand what you mean here... Suppose: > > host1 host2 > +---------------+ +--------------------+ | / > |ISP dial-up box+-ppp-+customer dial-up box+---customer subnet > +---------------+ +--------------------+ | \ > host4 host3 This is not the scenario where /128 would be used for. +---------------+ +---------------------+ |ISP dial-up box+-ppp-+customer dial-up HOST+ +---------------+ +---------------------+ is. For a LAN connection, using a /64 or larger is pretty much a no-brainer. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]