This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Fri May 6 15:01:30 CEST 2005
Just one more possibility of increasing privacy and security. Depending on who is the service provider, is up to the user to decide if they want to allow other service providers to access that information or not, and we should technically facilitate it, right ? If we start increasing the difficulties of making new things possible, we will end up repeating the IPv4 mistakes. The mistake here is limiting address space and subneting possibilities to be easily managed. >From both, the ISP and customer perspective, is much easier managing a flat network were everyone has /48 instead of having different "classes" of customers, because the goal is not to charge because you have or use /60 or /48, but because you use this or that bandwidth and/or this number of services, just like cable or satellite TV. You have a base service which doesn't limit you how many channels you have (technical limitations apart, of course), and you can in addition contract a set of services for your kids, sports, films, etc. But up-front, the base service doesn't limit what else you can buy ! Regards, Jordi > De: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com> > Responder a: "ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net" <ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net> > Fecha: Fri, 6 May 2005 14:49:48 +0200 > Para: <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> > CC: <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> > Asunto: Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site? > > On 6-mei-2005, at 14:41, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > >> So the clarified example will be: If the >> same service provider (probably the manufacturer but it may be also >> a third >> party company, even the ISP itself) is responsible for keeping the >> maintenance of the freezer and the washing machine and the dish >> washing >> machine, they could be allocated in a single subnet, but a >> different one >> that the supermarket that will refill my beverage in the freezer, >> and a >> different one that will refill the fish. > > Why?? > > What is the advantage of having the washing machine and the freezer > in different subnets? > > You didn't have to quote my entire message, btw. I still remember > what it said... > ************************************ Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit Registration open. Information available at: http://www.ipv6-es.com This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]