This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] documenting RIPE critical infrastructure/micro allocations

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] documenting RIPE critical infrastructure/micro allocations
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] documenting RIPE critical infrastructure/micro allocations

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Thu Jun 2 18:46:17 CEST 2005

On 2-jun-2005, at 18:33, leo vegoda wrote:

>> Also note that there appear to be no RIPE microallocations currently.

> We don't tend to use the term micro-allocations. We have made 51  
> assignments to IXPs: 50 were /48 and one was /64.

There are no /48s or /64s in ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/stats/delegated- 
ripencc-latest

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] documenting RIPE critical infrastructure/micro allocations
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] documenting RIPE critical infrastructure/micro allocations

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]