This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hans Petter Holen hph at oslo.net
Tue Jul 19 13:38:32 CEST 2005

Jeroen Massar wrote:

>
>Except that these are bound to be announced separately.
>Getting a block from ARIN, one from RIPE and one from APNIC seems
>plausible to me, but getting a block for every country one is in defeats
>the whole aggregation idea.
>

I dont really se what the benefit of getting different blocks from 
dfferent RIRs have. I get one single block I have the choice of 
announcing it as one prefix or as multiple prefixes. If I get multiple 
blocks I only have the choice of annoincing it as multiple prefixes.

-hph

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]