This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mohacsi Janos
mohacsi at niif.hu
Fri Jul 15 18:07:55 CEST 2005
What do you use for IPv6 loadbalancing? Best Regards, Janos Mohacsi Network Engineer, Research Associate NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE 21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98 On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Pim van Pelt wrote: > Hi, > > Gert wrote: > | We use Apache2 for IPv6 enabled web hosting customers (<< and we're not > | in Japan, we're in Europe/Germany :) ), and have had good success with it. > So have we, with a cluster of six Apache2 boxes running behind an IPv6 > enabled loadbalancer. > > | Our reference machine is our corporate server, http://www.space.net/. > http://www.bit.nl/ runs on our cluster as well. > > | Rumors say that recent Windows IIS's have IPv6 as well, but we have no > | experience with it. > We have a 4-box IIS6 cluster (DotNET). It has IPv6 on per default and > it's also behind the same IPv6 capable loadbalancer. > > groet, > Pim > -- > ---------- - - - - -+- - - - - ---------- > Pim van Pelt Email: pim at ipng.nl > http://www.ipng.nl/ IPv6 Deployment > ----------------------------------------------- > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]