This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Wed Dec 21 18:30:36 CET 2005
On Dec 21, Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas at uninett.no> wrote: > I know several sites that have both A and AAAA for all MXs. It doesn't > sound safe to me, but I assume it can't be that problematic then...? In my experience (linux.it and other domains, IIRC since three years) a single MX record with A + AAAA records has not caused deliverability errors for incoming nor for outgoing mail. The same applies to a domain with A and AAAA records and no explicit MX. (I had many more troubles from broken CPMTA installs, which for some unknown reason in Italy are often configured by default to not deliver mail to domains without a MX record.) -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20051221/cfd0e479/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]