This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stig Venaas
Stig.Venaas at uninett.no
Wed Dec 21 16:13:04 CET 2005
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Gert Doering: > > > So if I understand this correctly, having a v4-only backup MX should > > solve all problems commonly experienced? > > As far as I know, the primary MX needs an A record (to satisfy > Sendmail), and there needs to be a MX which has an A record only (and > no AAAA or A6 record; this is done to satisfy Exim installations). My > initial question to this list was whether if you can do this with just > a single IPv4 address, and still prefer IPv6 over IPv4 (assuming that > IPv6-capable hosts prefer IPv6 hosts over IPv4 hosts if they have the > same priority). At least at uninett.no this is done with only one IPv4 address. The primary MX has both A and AAAA, and the secondary is only A, but with same IPv4 address as primary. Well, you can check mx's for uninett.no yourself. I know several sites that have both A and AAAA for all MXs. It doesn't sound safe to me, but I assume it can't be that problematic then...? Stig
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Real-world IPv6 SMTP experience
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]