This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Tue Dec 6 14:58:50 CET 2005

* Elmar K. Bins:

> That's the independently-networking end-user problem we have. PI would
> solve that. Removal of the 200 customer rule would solve that. One-block-
> per-LIR would solve that.

Doesn't need DENIC two blocks, one for their production network, and
one for anycast?  Or would you be willing to subject yourself to an
ISP for the production network?  Why not for anycast service?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]