[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

Hi,

Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:09:12AM +0100, Sascha Lenz wrote:
>>The only way is to post some detailed policy suggestions and have some
>>kind of voting about it, either in public (e.g. usenet-wise) or on
>>RIPE/RIR level.
> 
> OK, so now we need to find consensus on how we want to do voting.

. o O(...)

> - does every LIR get one vote (I hear Daniel Roesen yelling)?
> 
> - does every person on the Internet get one vote?
> 
> - How do you prevent abuse due to "ok, all employees of $big_carrier vote X" 
>   (by coprorate order)?

actually, it's a RIR Policy. So it would be quite quite logical to
follow the RIR policy process and only let RIR-members ("LIR" or
whatever it's called outside RIPE) vote.

Don't really know if Daniel would yell on that.

But actually that's what i was thinking about (we're exclusively on RIPE
WG Mailinglists here anyways).
Don't know why i added the "in public" part in first place. No real
reason. It would be stupid to think about a "at large" vote on that
issue, ICANN failed trying to establish such things :-)

-- 
========================================================================
= Sascha Lenz                  SLZ-RIPE          slz at baycix.de         =
= Network Operations                                                   =
= BayCIX GmbH, Landshut                  * PGP public Key on demand *  =
========================================================================