[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:06:48PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 02:17:25PM +0100, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> > I think each LIR should get a /32 and we should drop the 200  
> > "customer" rule.  But that is just me...
> 
> Actually I like the "every AS should get a <network>" approach (with
> a yearly recurring fee for AS and network,

That sounds good, if the fee is reasonable (means: covers the cost of
this only, and  not subsidizing LIR operations of others).

> "Every LIR gets a /32 (upon request), no questions asked" is a concept
> that I'm also happy with - as I have said before.  For those that are
> afraid of the landrush: limit that policy to 5.000 LIRs per region.

Those kind of ideas can only come from folks who are already in the
business and have their own allocation already. *shaking head*

"Sorry, you're to late in the game - the market already has 5000 players,
but we have this nice transit offering with PA space here...". Brilliant.


Regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0