This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Tim Chown tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Mon Dec 5 17:32:51 CET 2005

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 02:17:25PM +0100, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> 
> I think each LIR should get a /32 and we should drop the 200  
> "customer" rule.  But that is just me...

That would be too easy :)

-- 
Tim/::1

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]