This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Kurt Erik Lindqvist kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Mon Dec 5 14:15:16 CET 2005

On 1 dec 2005, at 11.37, Per Heldal wrote:

>> user TE capability. It does not give the ISP the possibility to
>> ignore it, as they could today.
>
> Shim6 is work in progress and may be used as an argument to adjust
> adress-assignment policies sometime in the future. If we want ipv6
> deployed today we have to provide a mechanism to support requirements
> about redundancy and independence from individual providers.

Ok, that I agree with.

- kurtis -

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]